hu , not sure to follow you... first you said "the value in the global variable patch doesn't change." now "as if the flow was never stopped"...?
In my original workspace, I had several SendBusses sending information to the same named bus. This had the effect of one blocking the other.
and if you send send many information to the same bus , and if there is always something coming in , it's normal that the " has changed " module let always pass information ...?
If a value is sent to a bus and then the flow stopped, the value is still present on the receiving end. ...
So, after some more searching of the forums, I realise that usine works with only one SendBus of a particular named bus. So my solution to the global variable idea is to have many busses called for example: "set variable1", "set variable2", etc that are only used once in other patches but all lead to the same "get variable" bus as an output which can then be used all over the place.
Note that the var module isn't needed as the "get variable" bus retains it's value.
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 24 Sep 2009, 23:58
]]>2009-09-24T22:43:31+02:002009-09-24T22:43:31+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10236#p10236first you said "the value in the global variable patch doesn't change." now "as if the flow was never stopped"...? and if you send send many information to the same bus , and if there is always something coming in , it's normal that the " has changed " module let always pass information ...?
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 24 Sep 2009, 22:43
]]>2009-09-24T18:56:17+02:002009-09-24T18:56:17+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10235#p10235 This leaves me back to working out how to make a global variable...
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 24 Sep 2009, 18:56
]]>2009-09-24T07:23:57+02:002009-09-24T07:23:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10234#p10234be carefull to have exactly the same name for get / send bus ..? check space for example.. about capture tool , check FastStone Capture 6.5...
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 24 Sep 2009, 07:23
]]>2009-09-23T23:17:17+02:002009-09-23T23:17:17+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10233#p10233Statistics: Posted by dullard — 23 Sep 2009, 23:17
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 23 Sep 2009, 20:22
]]>2009-09-23T18:06:47+02:002009-09-23T18:06:47+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10231#p10231After searching the forum archives, there was mention of a global variable module but usine seems to no longer have one.
I have been using the following approach but it doesn't seem to work. Can anyone point out what is wrong with this method?
I created a patch with a ''set variable'' bus coming in and a ''get variable'' bus going out. Inside the patch is a variable module with the ''set variable'' bus going in to the input pin and a ''has changed'' module coming from the ''set variable'' bus going into the affect pin. The output of the variable module goes to the ''get variable'' bus.
I am writing to my global variable by sending the output from a pass module to the "set variable'' bus whenever I want to change the value... however the value in the global variable patch doesn't change.
Any ideas as to what's wrong with this approach or a better way of doing it I would be glad to hear.
Thanks
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 23 Sep 2009, 18:06
hu , not sure to follow you... first you said "the value in the global variable patch doesn't change." now "as if the flow was never stopped"...?
In my original workspace, I had several SendBusses sending information to the same named bus. This had the effect of one blocking the other.
and if you send send many information to the same bus , and if there is always something coming in , it's normal that the " has changed " module let always pass information ...?
If a value is sent to a bus and then the flow stopped, the value is still present on the receiving end. ...
So, after some more searching of the forums, I realise that usine works with only one SendBus of a particular named bus. So my solution to the global variable idea is to have many busses called for example: "set variable1", "set variable2", etc that are only used once in other patches but all lead to the same "get variable" bus as an output which can then be used all over the place.
Note that the var module isn't needed as the "get variable" bus retains it's value.
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 24 Sep 2009, 23:58
]]>2009-09-24T22:43:31+02:002009-09-24T22:43:31+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10236#p10236first you said "the value in the global variable patch doesn't change." now "as if the flow was never stopped"...? and if you send send many information to the same bus , and if there is always something coming in , it's normal that the " has changed " module let always pass information ...?
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 24 Sep 2009, 22:43
]]>2009-09-24T18:56:17+02:002009-09-24T18:56:17+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10235#p10235 This leaves me back to working out how to make a global variable...
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 24 Sep 2009, 18:56
]]>2009-09-24T07:23:57+02:002009-09-24T07:23:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10234#p10234be carefull to have exactly the same name for get / send bus ..? check space for example.. about capture tool , check FastStone Capture 6.5...
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 24 Sep 2009, 07:23
]]>2009-09-23T23:17:17+02:002009-09-23T23:17:17+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10233#p10233Statistics: Posted by dullard — 23 Sep 2009, 23:17
]]>2009-09-23T20:22:31+02:002009-09-23T20:22:31+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10232#p10232
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 23 Sep 2009, 20:22
]]>2009-09-23T18:06:47+02:002009-09-23T18:06:47+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1736&p=10231#p10231After searching the forum archives, there was mention of a global variable module but usine seems to no longer have one.
I have been using the following approach but it doesn't seem to work. Can anyone point out what is wrong with this method?
I created a patch with a ''set variable'' bus coming in and a ''get variable'' bus going out. Inside the patch is a variable module with the ''set variable'' bus going in to the input pin and a ''has changed'' module coming from the ''set variable'' bus going into the affect pin. The output of the variable module goes to the ''get variable'' bus.
I am writing to my global variable by sending the output from a pass module to the "set variable'' bus whenever I want to change the value... however the value in the global variable patch doesn't change.
Any ideas as to what's wrong with this approach or a better way of doing it I would be glad to hear.
Thanks
Statistics: Posted by dullard — 23 Sep 2009, 18:06