50 times faster!?! Yet another reason for me to being lazy with delving into Delphi or C++ user modules...
Well...cant 'not answer' one this one
You'll not be surprised if the SDK go a step ahead too
Not especially in term off speed (apart Usine core optimisation), but there will be some very deep end cool functions to access Usine core engine... don't know if all of them will be reflected in script.
Anyway, it will not change the complementarity between script (easy access and development) and SDK (deeper, faster, harder but complete freedom on what you code).
And on the script side... you are a master and we need you
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 19 Oct 2009, 11:19
just for info: the script engine of the V5 will be 50x faster than in the V4. It's not an hallucination ... really 50x faster....
??? wow!!! any more info on this? just wondering cause i believe scripts are interpreted by the native machine code and thus necessarily slower? however its done, v5 will surprise us in so many ways, i dont want to bother u with questions of what ought to be impossible
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 18 Oct 2009, 13:22
]]>2009-10-18T11:25:30+02:002009-10-18T11:25:30+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10375#p10375It's not an hallucination ... really 50x faster....
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 18 Oct 2009, 10:37
]]>2009-10-18T10:24:55+02:002009-10-18T10:24:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10372#p10372 @nay: hmmm.. we could try it. but i fear i couldnt make a script faster than the non-script module way. for data streams a C++ or Delphi module would be better. senso said about this: "C++ is 20x faster than script language but for midi manipulation it's not a problem: the midi rate is generally few midi events per second. Scripting does a good job."
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 18 Oct 2009, 10:24
added 2 small scripts that do something similar: switch1-2: 1 input, 2 outputs switch2-1: 2 inputs, 1 output they both make use of bsorks note closer technique once again. means: hanging noteOffs will be passed thru (if the input or output is not selected)
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 16 Oct 2009, 22:54
]]>2009-10-15T14:41:21+02:002009-10-15T14:41:21+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10358#p10358Statistics: Posted by bsork — 15 Oct 2009, 14:41
]]>
2009-10-15T12:13:28+02:002009-10-15T12:13:28+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10354#p10354 It's a simple patch with 1 midi in and 4 midi out. Simply choose towards wich midi out the midi flow will be pass through...
Changing the selection will send an "all note off" message to the four midi out.
In the midi tools section
Statistics: Posted by ethnix73 — 15 Oct 2009, 12:13
50 times faster!?! Yet another reason for me to being lazy with delving into Delphi or C++ user modules...
Well...cant 'not answer' one this one
You'll not be surprised if the SDK go a step ahead too
Not especially in term off speed (apart Usine core optimisation), but there will be some very deep end cool functions to access Usine core engine... don't know if all of them will be reflected in script.
Anyway, it will not change the complementarity between script (easy access and development) and SDK (deeper, faster, harder but complete freedom on what you code).
And on the script side... you are a master and we need you
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 19 Oct 2009, 11:19
just for info: the script engine of the V5 will be 50x faster than in the V4. It's not an hallucination ... really 50x faster....
??? wow!!! any more info on this? just wondering cause i believe scripts are interpreted by the native machine code and thus necessarily slower? however its done, v5 will surprise us in so many ways, i dont want to bother u with questions of what ought to be impossible
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 18 Oct 2009, 13:22
]]>2009-10-18T11:25:30+02:002009-10-18T11:25:30+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10375#p10375It's not an hallucination ... really 50x faster....
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 18 Oct 2009, 10:37
]]>2009-10-18T10:24:55+02:002009-10-18T10:24:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10372#p10372 @nay: hmmm.. we could try it. but i fear i couldnt make a script faster than the non-script module way. for data streams a C++ or Delphi module would be better. senso said about this: "C++ is 20x faster than script language but for midi manipulation it's not a problem: the midi rate is generally few midi events per second. Scripting does a good job."
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 18 Oct 2009, 10:24
added 2 small scripts that do something similar: switch1-2: 1 input, 2 outputs switch2-1: 2 inputs, 1 output they both make use of bsorks note closer technique once again. means: hanging noteOffs will be passed thru (if the input or output is not selected)
Statistics: Posted by amiga909 — 16 Oct 2009, 22:54
]]>2009-10-15T14:41:21+02:002009-10-15T14:41:21+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10358#p10358Statistics: Posted by bsork — 15 Oct 2009, 14:41
]]>2009-10-15T12:13:28+02:002009-10-15T12:13:28+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1752&p=10354#p10354 It's a simple patch with 1 midi in and 4 midi out. Simply choose towards wich midi out the midi flow will be pass through...
Changing the selection will send an "all note off" message to the four midi out.
In the midi tools section
Statistics: Posted by ethnix73 — 15 Oct 2009, 12:13