ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2521 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=20618#p20618 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by ErotiCore SteNch — 12 Aug 2011, 03:57


]]>
2010-11-13T20:43:24+02:00 2010-11-13T20:43:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16915#p16915 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 13 Nov 2010, 19:43


]]>
2010-10-28T03:26:07+02:00 2010-10-28T03:26:07+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16640#p16640 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Oct 2010, 03:26


]]>
2010-10-28T00:35:24+02:00 2010-10-28T00:35:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16638#p16638 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
Also, I'm on winXP if that makes any difference, and I think I'm still on v5beta-g as well, so i'll do an update to i and check it out then...

[EDIT] DOH -still happening on Version i... With auto resize on and a grid size of 4 when I click on an interface element to select it (without moving it etc) it shifts down about one grid size notch and left about two grid notches. With auto resize off everything seems to work as expected.

Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 28 Oct 2010, 00:35


]]>
2010-10-27T23:05:33+02:00 2010-10-27T23:05:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16637#p16637 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> really made it happen. I do however have a hunch that there's something with the auto sizing and the maths involved when snapping to the grid.

I did my test with the max grid size of 20 and with the grid visible, and something that struck me is that the auto-sizing does not "snap" but changes 1 pixel at the time - at least that's what it looks like to me. If you move something to the left or above of the exisiting area, the other elements are rightly moved to the right or downwards, but then they're no longer snapped to the grid even if they keep their relative positions. Then some further manipulations can change "something" that gives this behaviour, In the video the faders suddenly get spaces between them, in my test they partly overlapped instead, but I suppose it's the same explanation behind both behaviours.

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 27 Oct 2010, 23:05


]]>
2010-10-27T19:28:35+02:00 2010-10-27T19:28:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16635#p16635 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 27 Oct 2010, 19:28


]]>
2010-10-27T17:20:55+02:00 2010-10-27T17:20:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16633#p16633 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 17:20


]]>
2010-10-27T17:07:05+02:00 2010-10-27T17:07:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16632#p16632 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 17:07


]]>
2010-10-27T16:49:02+02:00 2010-10-27T16:49:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16631#p16631 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
Here you go

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 16:49


]]>
2010-10-27T16:36:26+02:00 2010-10-27T16:36:26+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16630#p16630 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
But like soundmind said, it happens even when being more subtle.

And like 23fx23 says, after countless hours with usine, i have interiorised strategies and workarounds for it not to happen !
I happened more to me at first when i was just moving things around without being extra careful.

But it still happens though, and just imagine spending an hour building an interface, then you move something and everything gets botched up ! The more complex the interface, the more often it might happen.

Right now, i can live with the occasionnal glitch, but i can see how some other people building more complex stuff might get annoyed. But don't get me wrong, overall, the interface builder and it's flexibility is a great feature in usine.

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 16:36


]]>
2010-10-27T16:14:45+02:00 2010-10-27T16:14:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16629#p16629 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>

and i can also suggest you to change the color background of the container for bleu (for example) and set the grid to visible this way , you'll see that the space between your faders correspond to a grid of 14 and it's not when you move the size of the container but when you click inside it that Usine try to reposition the faders..?

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 16:14


]]>
2010-10-27T15:43:36+02:00 2010-10-27T15:43:36+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16628#p16628 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> so I have no explanation, but it's seems very rare even for you?
You have to manipulate the control panel for 2 minutes in extreme situation, which never appears, or so rarely, in the real life?

Statistics: Posted by senso — 27 Oct 2010, 15:43


]]>
2010-10-27T15:30:28+02:00 2010-10-27T15:30:28+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16627#p16627 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> I had a few problems with your patch after i set all the grid sizes to 14.
Video : Here

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 15:30


]]>
2010-10-27T10:47:35+02:00 2010-10-27T10:47:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16622#p16622 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
i don't think it's a resolution problem cause i've test on
:
vista sp2 1680x1050
seven 32 1600x900
seven 64 1366x768 ( on this one I've also test on all resolution i can since 800x600 )

and can't reproduce it , so difficult to help , sorry

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 10:47


]]>
2010-10-27T09:05:19+02:00 2010-10-27T09:05:19+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16621#p16621 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> indeed that works on your computer and not on farfadet's one.
mmm something related to screen ratio/ resolutions on differents setups then?
here i got the pbs, but i found workarounds.

what i do for now is make rough global interface with grid 2 or 4, autoresize on, but larger than needed.
once the max target area size we need is set (contenair/patch boundaries) and global positionning done,
I disable auto-resize and set grid to 1.
then unwanted moves won't occur .
I try to avoid overlaping tricky zones such as contenair edges or caption zones and then it's fine usually.
some habit to take, but that works.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 27 Oct 2010, 09:05


]]>
2010-10-27T08:27:57+02:00 2010-10-27T08:27:57+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16620#p16620 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
FarfadetFarfelu,
That is exactly what im talking about. It does seem to happen at random here too.

nay-seven,
your video won't play in VLC.

FarfadetFarfelu's video demonstrates the problem and I will also add that you don't need to resize the patch to trigger that displacement. it also seems to happen when you just move one item and sometimes merely clicking on an item will shift everything to some degree. It has happened in all usine versions that Ive used (free and pro) and has seemed to have gotten worse with the addition of the function where the patch contents "scroll" when an item is moved beyond its bounds. In general there is no guarantee that items will remain in place especially when the patch is very complex.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 27 Oct 2010, 08:27


]]>
2010-10-27T07:30:47+02:00 2010-10-27T07:30:47+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16619#p16619 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> here a video :
and here the patch:
if you can check with this patch to be sure and if someone else can test too, could help us to find the problem

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 07:30


]]>
2010-10-27T04:36:38+02:00 2010-10-27T04:36:38+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16618#p16618 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>

Video Example

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 04:36


]]>
2010-10-27T04:20:55+02:00 2010-10-27T04:20:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16617#p16617 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> It's hard to tell on what occasion this happens, it always comes as a bad surprise.

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 04:20


]]>
2010-10-27T03:38:17+02:00 2010-10-27T03:38:17+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16615#p16615 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Still trying to work it out though.

Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 27 Oct 2010, 03:38


]]>
2010-10-26T22:37:27+02:00 2010-10-26T22:37:27+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16614#p16614 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> http://www.faststone.org/FSCaptureDetail.htm )( use for example a patch included in Usine ..?)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 26 Oct 2010, 22:37


]]>
2010-10-26T22:10:55+02:00 2010-10-26T22:10:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16613#p16613 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
I don't want this to sound harsh because I absolutely love usine in every other way but, the way usine handles snapping and item placement when building interfaces is simply not working properly. I know it has been suggested to turn off the snapping feature but this does not solve the problem completely and what if the snapping function is needed? My suggestion is to see if this issue can be solved. Are there any plans to work on this aspect of usine? Maybe a suggestion could be to make it function more like a traditional magnetic type of snapping with absolute positioning? In its current state I am afraid to unlock the interface and edit in fear of all the items losing their placement. Is anyone else having this experience?

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 26 Oct 2010, 22:10


]]>
BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2521 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 2011-08-12T03:57:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=20618#p20618 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by ErotiCore SteNch — 12 Aug 2011, 03:57


]]>
2010-11-13T20:43:24+02:00 2010-11-13T20:43:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16915#p16915 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 13 Nov 2010, 19:43


]]>
2010-10-28T03:26:07+02:00 2010-10-28T03:26:07+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16640#p16640 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Oct 2010, 03:26


]]>
2010-10-28T00:35:24+02:00 2010-10-28T00:35:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16638#p16638 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
Also, I'm on winXP if that makes any difference, and I think I'm still on v5beta-g as well, so i'll do an update to i and check it out then...

[EDIT] DOH -still happening on Version i... With auto resize on and a grid size of 4 when I click on an interface element to select it (without moving it etc) it shifts down about one grid size notch and left about two grid notches. With auto resize off everything seems to work as expected.

Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 28 Oct 2010, 00:35


]]>
2010-10-27T23:05:33+02:00 2010-10-27T23:05:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16637#p16637 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> really made it happen. I do however have a hunch that there's something with the auto sizing and the maths involved when snapping to the grid.

I did my test with the max grid size of 20 and with the grid visible, and something that struck me is that the auto-sizing does not "snap" but changes 1 pixel at the time - at least that's what it looks like to me. If you move something to the left or above of the exisiting area, the other elements are rightly moved to the right or downwards, but then they're no longer snapped to the grid even if they keep their relative positions. Then some further manipulations can change "something" that gives this behaviour, In the video the faders suddenly get spaces between them, in my test they partly overlapped instead, but I suppose it's the same explanation behind both behaviours.

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 27 Oct 2010, 23:05


]]>
2010-10-27T19:28:35+02:00 2010-10-27T19:28:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16635#p16635 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 27 Oct 2010, 19:28


]]>
2010-10-27T17:20:55+02:00 2010-10-27T17:20:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16633#p16633 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 17:20


]]>
2010-10-27T17:07:05+02:00 2010-10-27T17:07:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16632#p16632 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 17:07


]]>
2010-10-27T16:49:02+02:00 2010-10-27T16:49:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16631#p16631 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
Here you go

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 16:49


]]>
2010-10-27T16:36:26+02:00 2010-10-27T16:36:26+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16630#p16630 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
But like soundmind said, it happens even when being more subtle.

And like 23fx23 says, after countless hours with usine, i have interiorised strategies and workarounds for it not to happen !
I happened more to me at first when i was just moving things around without being extra careful.

But it still happens though, and just imagine spending an hour building an interface, then you move something and everything gets botched up ! The more complex the interface, the more often it might happen.

Right now, i can live with the occasionnal glitch, but i can see how some other people building more complex stuff might get annoyed. But don't get me wrong, overall, the interface builder and it's flexibility is a great feature in usine.

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 16:36


]]>
2010-10-27T16:14:45+02:00 2010-10-27T16:14:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16629#p16629 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>

and i can also suggest you to change the color background of the container for bleu (for example) and set the grid to visible this way , you'll see that the space between your faders correspond to a grid of 14 and it's not when you move the size of the container but when you click inside it that Usine try to reposition the faders..?

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 16:14


]]>
2010-10-27T15:43:36+02:00 2010-10-27T15:43:36+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16628#p16628 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> so I have no explanation, but it's seems very rare even for you?
You have to manipulate the control panel for 2 minutes in extreme situation, which never appears, or so rarely, in the real life?

Statistics: Posted by senso — 27 Oct 2010, 15:43


]]>
2010-10-27T15:30:28+02:00 2010-10-27T15:30:28+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16627#p16627 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> I had a few problems with your patch after i set all the grid sizes to 14.
Video : Here

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 15:30


]]>
2010-10-27T10:47:35+02:00 2010-10-27T10:47:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16622#p16622 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
i don't think it's a resolution problem cause i've test on
:
vista sp2 1680x1050
seven 32 1600x900
seven 64 1366x768 ( on this one I've also test on all resolution i can since 800x600 )

and can't reproduce it , so difficult to help , sorry

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 10:47


]]>
2010-10-27T09:05:19+02:00 2010-10-27T09:05:19+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16621#p16621 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> indeed that works on your computer and not on farfadet's one.
mmm something related to screen ratio/ resolutions on differents setups then?
here i got the pbs, but i found workarounds.

what i do for now is make rough global interface with grid 2 or 4, autoresize on, but larger than needed.
once the max target area size we need is set (contenair/patch boundaries) and global positionning done,
I disable auto-resize and set grid to 1.
then unwanted moves won't occur .
I try to avoid overlaping tricky zones such as contenair edges or caption zones and then it's fine usually.
some habit to take, but that works.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 27 Oct 2010, 09:05


]]>
2010-10-27T08:27:57+02:00 2010-10-27T08:27:57+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16620#p16620 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
FarfadetFarfelu,
That is exactly what im talking about. It does seem to happen at random here too.

nay-seven,
your video won't play in VLC.

FarfadetFarfelu's video demonstrates the problem and I will also add that you don't need to resize the patch to trigger that displacement. it also seems to happen when you just move one item and sometimes merely clicking on an item will shift everything to some degree. It has happened in all usine versions that Ive used (free and pro) and has seemed to have gotten worse with the addition of the function where the patch contents "scroll" when an item is moved beyond its bounds. In general there is no guarantee that items will remain in place especially when the patch is very complex.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 27 Oct 2010, 08:27


]]>
2010-10-27T07:30:47+02:00 2010-10-27T07:30:47+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16619#p16619 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> here a video :
and here the patch:
if you can check with this patch to be sure and if someone else can test too, could help us to find the problem

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 27 Oct 2010, 07:30


]]>
2010-10-27T04:36:38+02:00 2010-10-27T04:36:38+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16618#p16618 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>

Video Example

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 04:36


]]>
2010-10-27T04:20:55+02:00 2010-10-27T04:20:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16617#p16617 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> It's hard to tell on what occasion this happens, it always comes as a bad surprise.

Statistics: Posted by FarfadetFarfelu — 27 Oct 2010, 04:20


]]>
2010-10-27T03:38:17+02:00 2010-10-27T03:38:17+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16615#p16615 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> Still trying to work it out though.

Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 27 Oct 2010, 03:38


]]>
2010-10-26T22:37:27+02:00 2010-10-26T22:37:27+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16614#p16614 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]> http://www.faststone.org/FSCaptureDetail.htm )( use for example a patch included in Usine ..?)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 26 Oct 2010, 22:37


]]>
2010-10-26T22:10:55+02:00 2010-10-26T22:10:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2521&p=16613#p16613 <![CDATA[Interface builder needs help]]>
I don't want this to sound harsh because I absolutely love usine in every other way but, the way usine handles snapping and item placement when building interfaces is simply not working properly. I know it has been suggested to turn off the snapping feature but this does not solve the problem completely and what if the snapping function is needed? My suggestion is to see if this issue can be solved. Are there any plans to work on this aspect of usine? Maybe a suggestion could be to make it function more like a traditional magnetic type of snapping with absolute positioning? In its current state I am afraid to unlock the interface and edit in fear of all the items losing their placement. Is anyone else having this experience?

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 26 Oct 2010, 22:10


]]>