i could send a message from a subpatch to parent patch, but it would stop working when the patch becomes polyphonic, maybe cause usine creates virtually a parent patch in between, or some security reasons...
It should work normally, there is no security patch in between. I'll take a look.
]]>2011-03-19T21:13:44+02:002011-03-19T21:13:44+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18741#p18741and globally feel it uses more ressources to create lots of busses per voices.
but never thought or tested about the bus on/off trick via has chg, wich should do the job, and save ressources in many cases!! very clever idea! gonna test thanks!!!
]]>2011-03-19T21:03:55+02:002011-03-19T21:03:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18740#p18740 In fact, multiple occurence of the same send bus could work, if you use « has changed » to toggle the bus on/off. Just look at this example :
Another solution is to add the voice number as a suffix to busses names and use them as you want in the parent patch. The trick can be use to send data to each voice independently. It's also possible to make voices communicate between them. Example :
Statistics: Posted by gthibert — 19 Mar 2011, 20:03
]]>2011-03-19T19:35:20+02:002011-03-19T19:35:20+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18737#p18737 amazing. blasting simple, clever and powerfull. so much easier fun, testing speed, maintenance and tracking that i may revert a bit from scripts in favor to this in lot of cases. well done, really impressive.
one little thing i feel would go a lot in pair with the feature would be to allow a wireless access to parent patch. i could send a message from a subpatch to parent patch, but it would stop working when the patch becomes polyphonic, maybe cause usine creates virtually a parent patch in between, or some security reasons... ideally my dream feature would be multiple occurences of same named send bus possible (summed), but i think i was already talked about something very hard to implement.. , but maybe some easier possible tweaks of IML could allow that, not necessarely by summing, but allowing a polysubpatch to send data to parent patch ?
mmm i just think i could maybe just do a fader ouput with 'once in poly'!!! why searching complex.. still feel iml or send bus could be really insane cool, but it's all in the same 'connect all' subjects we often speak about
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2011-03-19T21:42:32+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/27942011-03-19T21:42:32+02:002011-03-19T21:42:32+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18743#p18743Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 19 Mar 2011, 20:42
]]>2011-03-19T21:31:02+02:002011-03-19T21:31:02+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18742#p18742
i could send a message from a subpatch to parent patch, but it would stop working when the patch becomes polyphonic, maybe cause usine creates virtually a parent patch in between, or some security reasons...
It should work normally, there is no security patch in between. I'll take a look.
]]>2011-03-19T21:13:44+02:002011-03-19T21:13:44+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18741#p18741and globally feel it uses more ressources to create lots of busses per voices.
but never thought or tested about the bus on/off trick via has chg, wich should do the job, and save ressources in many cases!! very clever idea! gonna test thanks!!!
]]>2011-03-19T21:03:55+02:002011-03-19T21:03:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18740#p18740 In fact, multiple occurence of the same send bus could work, if you use « has changed » to toggle the bus on/off. Just look at this example :
Another solution is to add the voice number as a suffix to busses names and use them as you want in the parent patch. The trick can be use to send data to each voice independently. It's also possible to make voices communicate between them. Example :
Statistics: Posted by gthibert — 19 Mar 2011, 20:03
]]>2011-03-19T19:35:20+02:002011-03-19T19:35:20+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2794&p=18737#p18737 amazing. blasting simple, clever and powerfull. so much easier fun, testing speed, maintenance and tracking that i may revert a bit from scripts in favor to this in lot of cases. well done, really impressive.
one little thing i feel would go a lot in pair with the feature would be to allow a wireless access to parent patch. i could send a message from a subpatch to parent patch, but it would stop working when the patch becomes polyphonic, maybe cause usine creates virtually a parent patch in between, or some security reasons... ideally my dream feature would be multiple occurences of same named send bus possible (summed), but i think i was already talked about something very hard to implement.. , but maybe some easier possible tweaks of IML could allow that, not necessarely by summing, but allowing a polysubpatch to send data to parent patch ?
mmm i just think i could maybe just do a fader ouput with 'once in poly'!!! why searching complex.. still feel iml or send bus could be really insane cool, but it's all in the same 'connect all' subjects we often speak about