I have at least figured out the problem. A solution is still a ways off!
-e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 09 Jun 2011, 08:24
]]>2011-06-08T09:32:57+02:002011-06-08T09:32:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19555#p19555Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 08 Jun 2011, 09:32
]]>
2011-06-08T09:10:11+02:002011-06-08T09:10:11+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19554#p19554 I forgot that most VSTs don't require you to save presets--if you edit a preset, it comes back that way the next time you select it.
So I need to save vst preset datas in the PM.... then I can actually make edits to them and save the edits in the conductor without losing the original presets. It's annoying that VSts (most of them anyway) behave this way. There's a reason no commercial synth is set up like this!!
Yikes, this is turning into a royal PITA
-e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 09:10
]]>2011-06-08T08:41:55+02:002011-06-08T08:41:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19553#p19553Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 08:41
]]>2011-06-08T08:11:29+02:002011-06-08T08:11:29+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19552#p19552 I think it is too much for now, I'll try to do it with a bunch of wait modules....
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 08:11
]]>2011-06-08T07:25:03+02:002011-06-08T07:25:03+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19551#p19551 I think it is possible. I'm wondering if it would work better to use a script, though.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 07:25
]]>2011-06-06T18:52:57+02:002011-06-06T18:52:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19529#p19529 I'd like to tweak knobs on the vst, and have the changes saved with the conductor, without having to also save the vst data into its own PM.
It should be possible, I just haven't got the timing right, I think. Here's the WKP:
My fear is that the conductor_changed impulse is not getting to the array before the cable from the vst does. And if this is the case, my idea is impossible.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 06 Jun 2011, 18:52
]]>2011-06-06T16:36:07+02:002011-06-06T16:36:07+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19527#p19527 or i would use an array out of vst, with a pass in between instead of stop, then out of the array a pass if chg back to vst. So when will recall conductor, the array will retransmit changes to vst, however, you pass data to array only when you want, ie via a button once your editing is ok for ex, or when pressing a save button: data first pass to array, then a wait one store to conductor. that way there should be no unwanted feedback without timing pbs.
]]>2011-06-06T09:20:41+02:002011-06-06T09:20:41+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19520#p19520256 presets addon by 23fx and link by bus the outlet num of the conductor to the inlet preset in of this addon could work..?
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 06 Jun 2011, 09:20
]]>2011-06-06T01:26:51+02:002011-06-06T01:26:51+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19519#p19519 I've tried saving parameters in the conductor, and it seems like it's actually pretty non-trivial.
Data is saved in arrays okay, but the hard part is figuring out how to keep the parameters from the vsts preset data from overwriting the array data every time the conductor is changed. So I need to block the event flow to the array when the conductor preset is changed, then send the data from the array to the VST, and then re-enable the connection from the VST to the array, so subsequent changes get passed to the array. I haven't found the right timig to make this work yet.
Regards my previous wkp, I realize I could just store the data from the dynamic faders in local faders per track, but it occurred to me that it would be nice if edits to a VST preset from within its own GUI could also be saved with the conductor.
Thanks for any tips, -e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 06 Jun 2011, 01:26
I have at least figured out the problem. A solution is still a ways off!
-e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 09 Jun 2011, 08:24
]]>2011-06-08T09:32:57+02:002011-06-08T09:32:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19555#p19555Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 08 Jun 2011, 09:32
]]>2011-06-08T09:10:11+02:002011-06-08T09:10:11+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19554#p19554 I forgot that most VSTs don't require you to save presets--if you edit a preset, it comes back that way the next time you select it.
So I need to save vst preset datas in the PM.... then I can actually make edits to them and save the edits in the conductor without losing the original presets. It's annoying that VSts (most of them anyway) behave this way. There's a reason no commercial synth is set up like this!!
Yikes, this is turning into a royal PITA
-e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 09:10
]]>2011-06-08T08:41:55+02:002011-06-08T08:41:55+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19553#p19553Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 08:41
]]>2011-06-08T08:11:29+02:002011-06-08T08:11:29+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19552#p19552 I think it is too much for now, I'll try to do it with a bunch of wait modules....
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 08:11
]]>2011-06-08T07:25:03+02:002011-06-08T07:25:03+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19551#p19551 I think it is possible. I'm wondering if it would work better to use a script, though.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 08 Jun 2011, 07:25
]]>2011-06-06T18:52:57+02:002011-06-06T18:52:57+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19529#p19529 I'd like to tweak knobs on the vst, and have the changes saved with the conductor, without having to also save the vst data into its own PM.
It should be possible, I just haven't got the timing right, I think. Here's the WKP:
My fear is that the conductor_changed impulse is not getting to the array before the cable from the vst does. And if this is the case, my idea is impossible.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 06 Jun 2011, 18:52
]]>2011-06-06T16:36:07+02:002011-06-06T16:36:07+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19527#p19527 or i would use an array out of vst, with a pass in between instead of stop, then out of the array a pass if chg back to vst. So when will recall conductor, the array will retransmit changes to vst, however, you pass data to array only when you want, ie via a button once your editing is ok for ex, or when pressing a save button: data first pass to array, then a wait one store to conductor. that way there should be no unwanted feedback without timing pbs.
]]>2011-06-06T09:20:41+02:002011-06-06T09:20:41+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19520#p19520256 presets addon by 23fx and link by bus the outlet num of the conductor to the inlet preset in of this addon could work..?
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 06 Jun 2011, 09:20
]]>2011-06-06T01:26:51+02:002011-06-06T01:26:51+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2900&p=19519#p19519 I've tried saving parameters in the conductor, and it seems like it's actually pretty non-trivial.
Data is saved in arrays okay, but the hard part is figuring out how to keep the parameters from the vsts preset data from overwriting the array data every time the conductor is changed. So I need to block the event flow to the array when the conductor preset is changed, then send the data from the array to the VST, and then re-enable the connection from the VST to the array, so subsequent changes get passed to the array. I haven't found the right timig to make this work yet.
Regards my previous wkp, I realize I could just store the data from the dynamic faders in local faders per track, but it occurred to me that it would be nice if edits to a VST preset from within its own GUI could also be saved with the conductor.
Thanks for any tips, -e
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 06 Jun 2011, 01:26