if you put each FX in a patch, it is //
chained is serial
O_o
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 04 Apr 2014, 01:48
]]>
Statistics: Posted by niggles — 03 Apr 2014, 09:24
]]>
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 02 Apr 2014, 22:27
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by niggles — 02 Apr 2014, 13:26
]]>
use a matrix to muster the intrecacies of routing and feedback !
cheers
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 02 Apr 2014, 13:18
]]>
* if you add lots of individual patches the Input goes through each patch simultaneously and the output is the result of how each patch changes the sound i.e the Output is the result of how each patch individually processes the sound i.e output = Patch A + Patch B + Patch C
* but if you write a complex patch where Output A is then fed into patch B and then Output B is fed into patch C etc... that Output A is modified by B and Output B is modified by C... i.e at each step it is working with an already modified signal rather than the original audio input i.e A -> B == A {transformed} -> C == B {transformed} [meaning effects are cumulative]
The attached image shows the process with A -> B -> C as a chain and then as Individual patches.
Hope the question makes sense.
Statistics: Posted by niggles — 02 Apr 2014, 13:01
]]>