]]>
Even something simple like upgraded versions of the factory library that use the new filters / oscillators would be cool.
Anyway, it's a great time to be a patch head
Statistics: Posted by ceasless — 09 Oct 2015, 12:15
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 07 Oct 2015, 01:24
]]>
Of course, looks aren't everything. But the new core-based oscillators and filters are deeply inviting sound wise too
Statistics: Posted by ceasless — 06 Oct 2015, 16:48
]]>
]]>
I actually plan to start with my first block today
An advanced form of the modulator I once wrote for Usine.
Cheers,
Tom
Statistics: Posted by Thomas Helzle — 30 Sep 2015, 12:03
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
If you are into DSP coding your own instruments or effects or simply want to explore the extremely deep user library for Reaktor, I'd say go for it. I personally wouldn't have updated for the blocks alone, but they are interesting (but monophonic and CPU-heavy since running everything at audio rate).
I updated since R6 addresses some things I always hated. It has much better cables, a better GUI, freely scalable VST, supports drag-and-drop samples etc.
And it was the first paid update in 10 years...
I also like that I can use the result in any DAW that supports VSTs.
Usine is more friendly to use but I wouldn't go into deep DSP patching with it (or rather use the SDK for that).
Maybe wait until the Demo version comes out? Reaktor is not for everybody and if you want to dig deeper, it is very different from Usine user-land-patching. I recently recreated my "Toms Midi Mangler" with mostly Reaktor Core and it is much more abstract to work with.
May agree with you, may not. Depends 100% on if it clicks with you personally.
Cheers,
Tom
Statistics: Posted by Thomas Helzle — 23 Sep 2015, 19:43
]]>
The blocks stuff does look good though!!! Mind you, dragging patches into tracks in usine effectively does the same thing, maybe just not as prettily?
Statistics: Posted by Clearscreen — 23 Sep 2015, 07:11
]]>
]]>
-s
Statistics: Posted by sephult — 12 Sep 2015, 02:59
]]>
Any thoughts from the community on the relative strengths/weaknesses of Hollyhock II vs. Reaktor 6? I'm looking for honest feedback here - I own both of them now and am excited to learn about Reaktor as a suppliment to Hollyhock. Wondering how it can augment my workflow.
Thanks!
Statistics: Posted by loneboat — 12 Sep 2015, 00:22
]]>