File uploaded: http://www.sensomusic.com/forums/upload ... 0fader.pat
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 28 Jun 2016, 16:28
]]>
Related threads:
http://www.sensomusic.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=4801
http://www.sensomusic.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=5309
Statistics: Posted by shawnb — 28 Jun 2016, 13:04
]]>
]]>
]]>
- how to you avoid one fader being the permanent slave of another (you need a "turning master")
- when the master fader is tuned, it has to tune the slave faders but the VST must only receive the master info (if not, the VST will add all the received values)
Check this with 2 faders, which can be extended to more faders.
Statistics: Posted by XpiR — 26 Jun 2016, 23:57
]]>
oli_lab's recommendation is to have each of the different faders go thru a "Pass If Changed" module. That way, they're not simultaneously sending contradictory input to control. The control will take the value of the last fader that was changed.
So..
Fader 1 => Pass If Changed 1 => your control
Fader 2 => Pass If Changed 2 => "
If you want both faders to have the same value, you can take the output of each "Pass" module to the input of the other Fader module. So essentially each fader controls both the control & the other fader. But at that point, it's probably easier to just use one fader...
Statistics: Posted by shawnb — 25 Jun 2016, 22:49
]]>
use "pass only has change" !
Thanks for replying. Can you please be a little bit more explanatory?Statistics: Posted by Ariajazz — 25 Jun 2016, 22:14
]]>
]]>
]]>