BrainModular

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T01:33:12+02:00

Yes, that's it! Thanks!

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 22 Nov 2018, 00:33

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T01:11:32+02:00

for clamping can use a second fader, or min/max(A,B)) math modules.

ie max(0, value) clamp negative values
min(1,value) will clamp anything above 1)

or if wanna use a single module can use array_clip module, wich let man set both min and max.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 22 Nov 2018, 00:11

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T00:02:29+02:00

the main problem is, I can't figure out how to filter out negative values. clipping option in Change Scale doesn't do it.

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 23:02

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T23:49:32+02:00

yeah, didn't think about making lfo -1 to 1, might do the trick. but I would also have to rescale any other modulation source.

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 22:49

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T22:46:51+02:00

not sur fully understood, but what i would do personally is use a normalized fader going from 0 to 1.
the 'modulation' out of lfo would go from -1 to 1, sclaled (multiplied) by matrix.
the "final" out is sum of both, clamped01, eventually rescaled to a target range.

so ie if mx is 0 its only the fader.
if mx is at 0.25 , mod wil alternate from -0.25 +0.25 around the fader value.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 21 Nov 2018, 21:46

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T18:27:45+02:00

Let's say I have fader and I might want to route LFO to it by Matrix cell value. Normally with Pass if changed module LFO would just take over the fader value to whatever LFO is outputing scaled by Matrix cell value. But I would rather like to have a sub-fader (maybe range fader fits better here?) outputing the final value, while main fader would be still adjustable and act as Bias adjuster. Therefore I need any incoming input to scale around main fader as 'center' of modulations and when Matrix cell value goes to 0, then main fader would act like normal fader.

Can't quite wrap my head around how to do it efficiently, and preferably without wiring cells out from matrix to check the values and scale many faders like that from there. That would be quite a wiring mess. But is it avoidable?

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 17:27

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T01:33:12+02:00

Yes, that's it! Thanks!

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 22 Nov 2018, 00:33

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T01:11:32+02:00

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 22 Nov 2018, 00:11

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-22T00:02:29+02:00

the main problem is, I can't figure out how to filter out negative values. clipping option in Change Scale doesn't do it.

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 23:02

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T23:49:32+02:00

yeah, didn't think about making lfo -1 to 1, might do the trick. but I would also have to rescale any other modulation source.

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 22:49

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T22:46:51+02:00

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 21 Nov 2018, 21:46

efficient solution for bias control of incoming value?

2018-11-21T18:27:45+02:00

Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 21 Nov 2018, 17:27