ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray
BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2019-01-18T02:45:12+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/63272019-01-18T02:45:12+02:002019-01-18T02:45:12+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40726#p40726Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 18 Jan 2019, 01:45
]]>
2019-01-17T21:13:28+02:002019-01-17T21:13:28+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40723#p40723Statistics: Posted by senso — 17 Jan 2019, 20:13
]]>2019-01-09T08:55:59+02:002019-01-09T08:55:59+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40671#p40671But I'll try to implement the soft-take-over on bindings in the next major release.
]]>2018-11-28T13:50:15+02:002018-11-28T13:50:15+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40465#p40465Perhaps a new module could be produced that does something like your patch, but in a more efficient manner. There are range faders have 2 ends and a cursor that can be used to show a controllable range, etc. I don't think there is a range fader in knob format though - which might be useful.
Simon.
Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 28 Nov 2018, 12:50
]]>2018-11-24T23:11:43+02:002018-11-24T23:11:43+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40433#p40433 That kind of thing is actually pretty common in DAW's where you can apply modulations to controls of the device and it looks kinda like this when you map it:
Currently I have to workaround with quite cumbersome patching which results in something similar:
But I'm not sure it's good to have so much patching for each and every parameter I want to be optionally modulated from matrix or elsewhere.
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2019-01-18T02:45:12+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/63272019-01-18T02:45:12+02:002019-01-18T02:45:12+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40726#p40726Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 18 Jan 2019, 01:45
]]>2019-01-17T21:13:28+02:002019-01-17T21:13:28+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40723#p40723Statistics: Posted by senso — 17 Jan 2019, 20:13
]]>2019-01-09T08:55:59+02:002019-01-09T08:55:59+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40671#p40671But I'll try to implement the soft-take-over on bindings in the next major release.
]]>2018-11-28T13:50:15+02:002018-11-28T13:50:15+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40465#p40465Perhaps a new module could be produced that does something like your patch, but in a more efficient manner. There are range faders have 2 ends and a cursor that can be used to show a controllable range, etc. I don't think there is a range fader in knob format though - which might be useful.
Simon.
Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 28 Nov 2018, 12:50
]]>2018-11-24T23:11:43+02:002018-11-24T23:11:43+02:00https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6327&p=40433#p40433 That kind of thing is actually pretty common in DAW's where you can apply modulations to controls of the device and it looks kinda like this when you map it:
Currently I have to workaround with quite cumbersome patching which results in something similar:
But I'm not sure it's good to have so much patching for each and every parameter I want to be optionally modulated from matrix or elsewhere.