ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/6436 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41096#p41096 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 16 Apr 2019, 23:02

]]> 2019-04-16T19:43:14+02:00 2019-04-16T19:43:14+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41093#p41093 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> I don't want to loose the modular part of Usine, and I also use the curve mapper when needed. The problem is that midi learn curve and scale react in different ways for a single object (faders and knobs). We are "Usine power users"! but for a newbie, It could be disappointed to have in the same time a log scale with a exp midi curve.

@Senso. the S curve could be usefull...

@sm_jamieson @senso @ 23fx23 : an implementation with 23fx23's touch fader ?

Statistics: Posted by rlgsbt — 16 Apr 2019, 19:43

]]> 2019-04-16T18:44:14+02:00 2019-04-16T18:44:14+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41091#p41091 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> For example, I almost never use midi learn, I would be desapointed if my favorite software was to loose overall performance for a new functionality that I will never use. The beauty of Usine in this peculiar case is that you could always insert a curve mapper after the fader to get the desired control.
Usine has evolved thru time to be more efficient, not heavier on the computer, that is very rare in the music software business.

Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 16 Apr 2019, 18:44

]]> 2019-04-16T17:48:11+02:00 2019-04-16T17:48:11+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41090#p41090 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Simon.

Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 16 Apr 2019, 17:48

]]> 2019-04-16T08:10:49+02:00 2019-04-16T08:10:49+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41087#p41087 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Statistics: Posted by senso — 16 Apr 2019, 08:10

]]> 2019-04-12T07:12:24+02:00 2019-04-12T07:12:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41082#p41082 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Would it be possible (for HH4) that the midi learn curve (+ coeff) and the scale be the same for faders and knobs? Now, you can have a linear scale with a log midi control ! or both, etc. I'm used to it, but it might be cool to manage a fader with the mouse/ touch sreen and have the fader react to a power curve or a drawn curve!
thanks

Statistics: Posted by rlgsbt — 12 Apr 2019, 07:12

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/6436 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 2019-04-16T23:02:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41096#p41096 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 16 Apr 2019, 23:02

]]> 2019-04-16T19:43:14+02:00 2019-04-16T19:43:14+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41093#p41093 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> I don't want to loose the modular part of Usine, and I also use the curve mapper when needed. The problem is that midi learn curve and scale react in different ways for a single object (faders and knobs). We are "Usine power users"! but for a newbie, It could be disappointed to have in the same time a log scale with a exp midi curve.

@Senso. the S curve could be usefull...

@sm_jamieson @senso @ 23fx23 : an implementation with 23fx23's touch fader ?

Statistics: Posted by rlgsbt — 16 Apr 2019, 19:43

]]> 2019-04-16T18:44:14+02:00 2019-04-16T18:44:14+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41091#p41091 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> For example, I almost never use midi learn, I would be desapointed if my favorite software was to loose overall performance for a new functionality that I will never use. The beauty of Usine in this peculiar case is that you could always insert a curve mapper after the fader to get the desired control.
Usine has evolved thru time to be more efficient, not heavier on the computer, that is very rare in the music software business.

Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 16 Apr 2019, 18:44

]]> 2019-04-16T17:48:11+02:00 2019-04-16T17:48:11+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41090#p41090 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Simon.

Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 16 Apr 2019, 17:48

]]> 2019-04-16T08:10:49+02:00 2019-04-16T08:10:49+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41087#p41087 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Statistics: Posted by senso — 16 Apr 2019, 08:10

]]> 2019-04-12T07:12:24+02:00 2019-04-12T07:12:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6436&p=41082#p41082 <![CDATA[Faders : scale & midi learn curve]]> Would it be possible (for HH4) that the midi learn curve (+ coeff) and the scale be the same for faders and knobs? Now, you can have a linear scale with a log midi control ! or both, etc. I'm used to it, but it might be cool to manage a fader with the mouse/ touch sreen and have the fader react to a power curve or a drawn curve!
thanks

Statistics: Posted by rlgsbt — 12 Apr 2019, 07:12

]]>