I plan to create a real 8x8 vst version of usine very soon.
Wow, great news!When used inside a capable host, this will enable using Usine VST as a modular patching center, relying on the routing features of the host when piping audio in/out of it (instead of loading multiple wrapper plugins on different channels). In my opinion, this makes it much more user friendly to pair with environments like, say, Ableton Live. Just great.
This will rock
!Statistics: Posted by guenon — 19 Apr 2008, 20:30
]]>
thanks so much..
Samuele
Statistics: Posted by angel777 — 19 Apr 2008, 19:51
]]>
You are right, the 'render' function will probably cause problem with lan, except the real time render like in Pro Tool or x1 in Reaper.
Statistics: Posted by senso — 19 Apr 2008, 18:33
]]>
From the master machine,recalling your project,automatically you can load the vst on the slave machine with it's presets.All in one step.
As you suggested(i think) you have(after loading the project in the master machine)to load usine stand alone(on the distant pc)and then load in the preset of your project...and..with fxteleport is more simple to set latency: just drag the latency bar when you have to mix with heavy load..instead with 3 istances have to set latency for all of them.
..as last question:if i do an "export mixdown" in nuendo(as exemple) with OSC will it "see" usine standalone as a plugin or it will be possible to do it only in "real time".
Let me know if i'm wrong about what i understanded about OSC...
thanks,
Samuele
Statistics: Posted by angel777 — 19 Apr 2008, 13:56
]]>
then communicate with OSC over the lan.
Statistics: Posted by senso — 19 Apr 2008, 13:37
]]>
I'm working in a surround setup so i need a vst version with 6 ins and 6 outs.
have to wait so?
thank you!
Statistics: Posted by angel777 — 19 Apr 2008, 12:42
]]>
Statistics: Posted by senso — 19 Apr 2008, 12:37
]]>
thanks a lot!
Samuele
Statistics: Posted by angel777 — 19 Apr 2008, 12:32
]]>
Not trying to derail this thread, but this is a first post and the forum limits new topics until I've responded to an existing thread. New dumb question coming.
Thanks,
John
Statistics: Posted by John K — 10 Apr 2008, 19:48
]]>
Now imagine what you can do on stage with a dual screen sytem: on screen for your main vst, another for usine....
Statistics: Posted by senso — 10 Apr 2008, 10:00
]]>
@hcv242: If you want to turn several plugin GUIs on and off at the same time, you can create a button within Usine that opens and closes as many GUIs you like with a single click.
Statistics: Posted by bsork — 10 Apr 2008, 09:50
]]>
renoise cant see it as a VSTi ...only as a VSTfx. is this correct ? hope not.
I'll take a look, not tested yet with renoise.Usine is a very large soft which can't be resumed as a simple "Rack chainer". Usine is designed to add a real Live performance layer to your favorite host.i dont like the fact that there are two "windows"...
As Usine allows the design of personal interfaces (like 'display what you really want to see on the screen') for me it's not in its general philosophy to hide the main screen?
The real question is now 'what is the difference between a normal host and a Live oriented host?'
Statistics: Posted by senso — 10 Apr 2008, 09:01
]]>
" renoise cant see it as a VSTi ...only as a VSTfx. is this correct ? hope not.
i dont like the fact that there are two "windows" in the vst (usine opens in a second window outside the vst host / sequencer). like that i have to click two times to see usine's gui. i was thinking to use usine mainly as a plugin chainer . a plug chainer in my opinion should be "invisible" to the user, so that when you click the chainer you will see immediately the guis of the plugs that the chainer is hosting (like in energyxt's window docking). guess ill have to keep searching for a ext replacement.
if im overlooking something please tell...i might not be using usine in the best/right way.
anyways, thanks a lot for the free version. "
Statistics: Posted by hcv242 — 10 Apr 2008, 01:47
]]>