Welcome to %s forums

??? I'm sure I tried that ! I'm going to try it again. Thanks !

I think it is more fundamental that the no input ;-) For no input, the patches just don't need to have any audio input module, while for no output, the idea is to have the patches producing sound (=> they have audio output modules), but to have the tracks not directly routed to any output, because i...

Ok Thanks for the answer. I have to check that. What would be the use of the selected output in a track that has an aux as input... ?

And what about the "No output" ?

Great !

Hello, I would like that a track has no output, because it is another track has this one as input. There is no way to select a "No output" as output, while keeping the track playing. As a workaround, I set the output to a virtual output with no physical output behind. This does the trick, but it is ...

Hello, I've tried to pass midi messages from track to track. In a 1st track I have various midi file players, midi generators, ... and in 2nd one, I put for example a patch with sampler, a VSTi, ... The patches of the 1st track have Midi outputs. The 2nd track has the 1st track as input and its patc...

And what about more than one VST directory ? I'm used to Traktion, where I can have several VST folders: one for the reliable ones, one for new/in-test ones, ...

Very nice soft, indeed !

+1

lalo wrote:at present i select the "aux" input for a track that i want to work as an aux...is it the way it is supposed to work?

Same question as Lalo. I do the same way. Is this the way it is supposed to be done ?

And what about the lasso selection of modules with a modifier key ?

+100 !

Both suggestions should be really handy, especially the renaming of the patches. In many cases I created patches with no name. It is only possible to distinguish them (when selected) by adding a text in the patch. From the grid, there is no way to distinguish them. What about being able to reorganis...