Search found 4 matches
- 08 Dec 2008, 21:09
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: NEED: one clear answer about CPU savings when muted or bypass
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6792
I will try to study on this senso. Very exciting because USINE has feature that suit my thinking beautifully I think... :--) So... if anyone can explain what senso means... in 2nd part of response above. For me thie only thing is finding a way to AVOID multiple instances of the plugin being in ram f...
- 07 Dec 2008, 19:23
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: NEED: one clear answer about CPU savings when muted or bypass
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6792
thank you senso. SO... when used standalone USINE can (with contoller, or note or whatever command) MUTE/BYPASS a VST routing and save ALL of the CPU usage??? This is a big feature as loading up a lot of VST is great only if they are ready to go yet NOT taking up the CPU by being ready. Can anyone t...
- 07 Dec 2008, 08:51
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: NEED: one clear answer about CPU savings when muted or bypass
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6792
Hi.... great to be here! So... forte is good.. USINE is way more 'me' ... Thing is... after way to many months (understatement) of complexities I'm looking to do with USINE what I would do with forte...EXCEPT I'm thinking that by using usine as a VST in REAPER I can select locations in the arrange p...
- 07 Dec 2008, 08:44
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Solving audio problems. Discussion on best Hard/Soft-ware config.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10244
