Page 1 of 1

Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 17:22
by SylvainT
Hello Usiners,
So, two new Add-Ons uploaded

The Polyrhythm Sequencer :

This workspace is a rhythm sequencer, based on Nay-Seven and r.erorr ideas. At the beginning, that was a task to experiment array modules, matrix modules, polyphonic patches... The result look very interesting, so I want to share it with you. This workspace allows you to experience all this polyrhythms and all the polyspeeds you imagine.
Explanations are in the worspace.
All that stuff is pretty expensive in CPU, I really don't know why. So, any suggestions for involving this workspace are really welcome.

The Delays :

Delays based on joffodubdelay, with new controls, more feedback, new panner possibilities, FX send added
one is for stereo use, one is for quadriphonic use
you can find inside the patch a script that allows you to fill an array with a log, exp, cos, linear curve. That was the reason of that work
someone could be interested

Thanks for feedback

Sylvain

Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 22:53
by nay-seven
huge work slydeparis ! ( and they say I'm crazy... ;-) )
Really cool to add polyrhythms,now as you say it's really expensive in CPU
will take a moment to explore this monster,
maybe try to built a lite version..?
only 4 track, no effect, less buses, more on/off modules use and so..?
an interesting way to work is also to try to optimize a 1 track patch and duplicate in a second time...

Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 23:32
by joffo78
hi nay. I'm very proud that you use my work to elaborate one addon :D
I will try this.
ciao

Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 23:40
by nay-seven
mm, maybe a little misunderstood here..?
it's Slydeparis who built this one ...;)

Posted: 12 Mar 2012, 10:25
by SylvainT
Thanks Nay
Remember that basics of this sequencer are you're ideas
When you mute one track, it's a patch on/off, so the track doesn't use any CPU more, in the sequencer and in the sampler (cause patch on/off works in poly).
I agree with a lite version, but I want to understand why it is so expensive in CPU. It's just a 8 tracks sequencer with some small FX.
Is it because Usine is very expensive in CPU? Maybe it's the price to pay for good sound?

Regards

Sylvain

Posted: 12 Mar 2012, 22:08
by 23fx23
mmm OT: sorry for question but SlydeParis are you the singer of Danforth? (who is also called sly, and sylvain, and from paris but i suppose you are few..:p)

Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 07:48
by SylvainT
Hello 23fx23
No, Im not a singer, I'm a sound engineer

Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 15:29
by senso
well done sylvain. I love the sound!

Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 19:03
by multiphone
Hello Sylvain,

I like the sound too, congrat.

Best

Posted: 15 Mar 2012, 10:47
by SylvainT
Thanks Olivier and Hervé for feedback
Did you have time to look at this workspace more deeply to explain me about heavy processing?

All te best

Sylvain

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 11:57
by noise2sine
Hello,

Really great job, but really heavy !!! Is there any chance to have a lighter version ? it would be wonderful !

Posted: 01 Jul 2012, 21:13
by SylvainT
I didn't look at this workspace since months, but thinking of it those days. I have some ideas to make it lighter, with possibility to choose from 4 to 8 tracks.
In fact, I thing that this kind of workspace are not usefull for live applications
But for making grooves at home it could be good

Regards

Sylvain