Posted: 20 Aug 2014, 09:12
Hi,
New here, and probing for some answers and/or suggestions...
I'm a long-time [old school] modular synthesist, and I'm now looking into possibilities to use a digital/modern workflow for "directing" live performances. Since I don't want to do 100% improvised performances, but rather use a fixed, rigid backbone (a score, as it were) to have a time-based foundation on which semi-improvised performances can "float", I'm looking into software which can make this possible.
Been using Numerology for quite a while, which can have a linear timeline, but doesn't allow me to interact bi-directionally with it in a flexible way. Meaning: the software can/should control the hardware, but the hardware must also be able to talk to (and control) the software in real time.
Hollyhock does seem to be able to handle the latter well (bi-directional interactivity) -- or at least, I think so -- but doesn't have a timeline in which certain actions can be performed/executed in a linear manner. Or does it ?
For example: I need a software-based master clock (tempo & timebase), which also controls the hardware (modulars) -- easy enough to do. But since none of my synths have preset memories (well, my Buchla Easels kinda have that, with their program cards), I need to send control signals (and other stuff) to the modulars at certain - and pre-defined - points in time. I use a DC-coupled audio interface to do so, which is configured to both send and receive CV's (and audio). Additionally, I can also use MIDI, but only in primitive ways, to control certain parameters of the modulars.
Besides the tempo-backbone, the software must also be able to run a "backing track" in parallel (there's only so much one can do live with modulars), and have hardware-triggerable samples (via MIDI controllers and/or analog CV/Gates) ready to launch at any given time.
Put simply: I need something which allows me to define a complete composition beforehand (a basic score), then run that live, allowing me in the most flexible of ways to interact with it in real time.
So, basically, the question is whether Hollyhock could be used in such a manner ?
Thanks for any replies and suggestions !
_Guy
New here, and probing for some answers and/or suggestions...
I'm a long-time [old school] modular synthesist, and I'm now looking into possibilities to use a digital/modern workflow for "directing" live performances. Since I don't want to do 100% improvised performances, but rather use a fixed, rigid backbone (a score, as it were) to have a time-based foundation on which semi-improvised performances can "float", I'm looking into software which can make this possible.
Been using Numerology for quite a while, which can have a linear timeline, but doesn't allow me to interact bi-directionally with it in a flexible way. Meaning: the software can/should control the hardware, but the hardware must also be able to talk to (and control) the software in real time.
Hollyhock does seem to be able to handle the latter well (bi-directional interactivity) -- or at least, I think so -- but doesn't have a timeline in which certain actions can be performed/executed in a linear manner. Or does it ?
For example: I need a software-based master clock (tempo & timebase), which also controls the hardware (modulars) -- easy enough to do. But since none of my synths have preset memories (well, my Buchla Easels kinda have that, with their program cards), I need to send control signals (and other stuff) to the modulars at certain - and pre-defined - points in time. I use a DC-coupled audio interface to do so, which is configured to both send and receive CV's (and audio). Additionally, I can also use MIDI, but only in primitive ways, to control certain parameters of the modulars.
Besides the tempo-backbone, the software must also be able to run a "backing track" in parallel (there's only so much one can do live with modulars), and have hardware-triggerable samples (via MIDI controllers and/or analog CV/Gates) ready to launch at any given time.
Put simply: I need something which allows me to define a complete composition beforehand (a basic score), then run that live, allowing me in the most flexible of ways to interact with it in real time.
So, basically, the question is whether Hollyhock could be used in such a manner ?
Thanks for any replies and suggestions !
_Guy