Page 1 of 1

Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 09:15
by woodslanding
If the max could be low and the min high, it would totally make working with drawbars 1000 times easier.....

(Still struggling to get the vst param script to work with reverse faders....)

Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 09:20
by La Tenaille
+1
I was thinking about posting this one.

Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 09:54
by gurulogic
Wouldn't that be done like this? Or am I missing the point...
kara wrote:Fader with min 0 and max 100 goes to an (A-B) module where you set A=100 and B the input of your fader.
Is that what you want ?

k

Posted: 30 Apr 2010, 00:05
by 23fx23
another might be simple in some cases workaround: inverse fader and baground color gives a visual inverted fader, keeping normal wiring, or flip the jpg sequence image horizontally if jpg based..

Posted: 30 Apr 2010, 03:04
by Clearscreen
It'd be nice to be able to rotate elements in the IB - I've thought about that before...

Posted: 02 May 2010, 07:10
by woodslanding
Yeah, I've been able to work around everything (Lots of ABS(1 - x) everywhere)

except sending IML.

Still haven't figured that out. And maybe switching the fader values wouldn't help anyway.

Posted: 07 May 2010, 19:03
by jeanrene
127 - (0->127) = (127->0)

(0->127) is the fader
127 - a box "-" in math, "127" in "a" and "fader" in "b"
(127->0) is the result (invert fader)

I post this patch the next week, good weekend

Posted: 08 May 2010, 11:05
by jeanrene
"REVERSED FADER" exemple is in add-ons pack (PatcherKit) in Data tools

Posted: 09 May 2010, 08:14
by woodslanding
Thanks jeanrene--I'm sure that will be useful.

I don't have problems reversing faders, though. My issue was addressing reversed faders via IML.

I figured that one out also (well, Bsork did most of the work!) and will post it, although it is quite a complicated solution.

-e

Posted: 09 May 2010, 21:49
by bsork
woodslanding wrote:I figured that one out also (well, Bsork did most of the work!) and will post it, although it is quite a complicated solution.
-e
...uh... I did?

Posted: 10 May 2010, 06:38
by woodslanding
Ummm.... I think it was you (?)

Posted: 11 May 2010, 17:43
by 23fx23
i think it was me but no worries ;)

Posted: 12 May 2010, 22:27
by woodslanding
oop, sorry :/