Welcome to %s forums

BrainModular Users Forum

Login Register

Audio Signal Flow Order - Serial / Parallel?

I need help on a Patch
Post Reply
niggles
Member
Posts: 32
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Unread post by niggles » 02 Apr 2014, 13:01

It's a bit hard to tell because the patches I'm designing are meant to "mangle" the sounds, but am I right in thinking that:

* if you add lots of individual patches the Input goes through each patch simultaneously and the output is the result of how each patch changes the sound i.e the Output is the result of how each patch individually processes the sound i.e output = Patch A + Patch B + Patch C

* but if you write a complex patch where Output A is then fed into patch B and then Output B is fed into patch C etc... that Output A is modified by B and Output B is modified by C... i.e at each step it is working with an already modified signal rather than the original audio input i.e A -> B == A {transformed} -> C == B {transformed} [meaning effects are cumulative]

The attached image shows the process with A -> B -> C as a chain and then as Individual patches.

Image

Hope the question makes sense.
Digital Director & Programmer by Day | Musician By Night
iMac Core I7 | Usine | Logic | Leap Motion (loving it)
http://www.tribe404.com

User avatar
oli_lab
Member
Posts: 1263
Location: Brittany, France
Contact:

Unread post by oli_lab » 02 Apr 2014, 13:18

Serial or // ?
I'd say serial AND //
use a matrix to muster the intrecacies of routing and feedback !

cheers
http://oli-lab.org

Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces

follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social

niggles
Member
Posts: 32
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Unread post by niggles » 02 Apr 2014, 13:26

I haven't explored any Matrix functions (?) yet - just trying to write my own patches and logic before doing some Fast-script experiments - I learn best from doing it the hard way and then making it modular (OOP) once I know how it all works ;)
Digital Director & Programmer by Day | Musician By Night
iMac Core I7 | Usine | Logic | Leap Motion (loving it)
http://www.tribe404.com

ceasless
Member
Posts: 330
Contact:

Unread post by ceasless » 02 Apr 2014, 13:49

I think he means the Matrix patches, specifically "matrix of audio". I've never used it myself yet, but I believe it allows you to route different audio signals (represented by columns?) to different audio paths/outputs (represented by rows?). Hopefully someone who knows can provide a few more details.

User avatar
oli_lab
Member
Posts: 1263
Location: Brittany, France
Contact:

Unread post by oli_lab » 02 Apr 2014, 22:27

quite easy, just watch out for feedback on the diagonals...

Image
http://oli-lab.org

Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces

follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social

niggles
Member
Posts: 32
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Unread post by niggles » 03 Apr 2014, 09:24

Hmm, doesn't answer the question - does chaining the FX modify the previous input as opposed to the raw sample (complex patch picture) as opposed to operating simultaneously on the raw sample (individual patches picture) :P
Digital Director & Programmer by Day | Musician By Night
iMac Core I7 | Usine | Logic | Leap Motion (loving it)
http://www.tribe404.com

User avatar
oli_lab
Member
Posts: 1263
Location: Brittany, France
Contact:

Unread post by oli_lab » 04 Apr 2014, 01:48

I'm not sure I understood the question.

if you put each FX in a patch, it is //
chained is serial

O_o
http://oli-lab.org

Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces

follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests