hi,
i've already submit this problem in the french forum, without result. Maybe it has no solution for now. but i give my chance just in case. it could be a suggestion for the coming versions of hollyhock, or maybe someone has an idea, or has already scripted or patched something.
So, i'm looking for a way to save an audio file (loaded in the file list of any sampler) under a new name, but without openning the file list myself, and write the new name,etc.. i'd like it to become "patchable" ,in order to make this more automatical.
Any idea ?
Auto-save
Use the save rand, put a timer on this if you want it to auto-save. Maybe this is what you are trying to look for?
You can specify the prefix, directory name, etc, and add to list.
-s
You can specify the prefix, directory name, etc, and add to list.
-s
"Every act of creation is first an act of destruction." -Picasso
-
ringmodulator
- Member
- Posts: 35
- Contact:
Thanks, sephult,
But save rand, or save name (and adding a prefix ) work only for a recorded file,stored in a buffer memory. I wish to manipulate files which are already in the file list, with loaded samples, not just recorded.
My goal is to use a sampler like an audio editor, and be able to sort a huge number of audio files. (That's why i need to patch some automation ).[small][/small]
But save rand, or save name (and adding a prefix ) work only for a recorded file,stored in a buffer memory. I wish to manipulate files which are already in the file list, with loaded samples, not just recorded.
My goal is to use a sampler like an audio editor, and be able to sort a huge number of audio files. (That's why i need to patch some automation ).[small][/small]
-
ringmodulator
- Member
- Posts: 35
- Contact:
Well, i've finally find my way using 2 samplers : one player, one recorder, and some manipulations on "the rand save" fonction.
However, the recorder being triggered ( and stopped) by the "is playing" from the player, i should have 2 identical files. But the re-recorded one is always shorter, something like less than 1 ms..maybe it's the latency of the "is playing" or of the rec inlet ?
Anyway. Here come my question. If the missing part of the recorded sound is at the beginning, does just 1millisecond have importance for the transcients quality,( for i know they have a lot to do in the sound, even if they are very very short.) ? If it does, i will have to find a way to delete this latency. Feel free to tell me if i'm talking about a wrong problem,or not.
2nd question : how can i change the resolution of the recorder, which is set for now at 32bit ?
However, the recorder being triggered ( and stopped) by the "is playing" from the player, i should have 2 identical files. But the re-recorded one is always shorter, something like less than 1 ms..maybe it's the latency of the "is playing" or of the rec inlet ?
Anyway. Here come my question. If the missing part of the recorded sound is at the beginning, does just 1millisecond have importance for the transcients quality,( for i know they have a lot to do in the sound, even if they are very very short.) ? If it does, i will have to find a way to delete this latency. Feel free to tell me if i'm talking about a wrong problem,or not.
2nd question : how can i change the resolution of the recorder, which is set for now at 32bit ?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests