Welcome to %s forums

BrainModular Users Forum

Login Register

Master rack

Tell us what you'd like Usine to do
Post Reply
User avatar
x.iso
Member
Posts: 565
Location: RU, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Unread post by x.iso » 04 Nov 2017, 23:07

I think that one it a bit overdue. Since there is no default master rack to where all other racks are routed by default, we have to either route every rack (and every time new rack is made) to one that we manually consider 'master' rack, or modify Stereo Out device patch to insert any global effects or mastering.

Both are problematic: one is tedious (and also dragging rack to other rack's input is quite challenging if it's too far away and you have to scroll at the same time) and the other is ignored in recording and also the patch persists above all workspaces (which is both bad and can be useful).
Master track would solve both problems with snapshots, so we could recall different mastering/fx setups from rack itself, and all new racks would be routed through this master rack.
join Hollyhock Usine Discord server: https://discord.gg/EdJarnE

User avatar
rlgsbt
Member
Posts: 187
Location: Marseille
Contact:

Unread post by rlgsbt » 05 Nov 2017, 09:04

you can create a rack with all your sends, inputs/outputs and save it to "Usine Hollyhock Win64 3.0.139ResourcesTemplatesRacks". Then, your new rack will overwrite the default one.

User avatar
x.iso
Member
Posts: 565
Location: RU, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Unread post by x.iso » 09 Dec 2017, 16:56

So I'm using workspace template which is same as usual empty workspace, except with Limiter and Spectrum patches on first rack, named Master. Then new racks also use edited template, so they output to 'master rack' instead of Stereo Out. All would be fine with that kind of approach, but it breaks the normal usage of Solo buttons, since I have to use solo on master track as well as anything else. Thus suggestion still relevant.
join Hollyhock Usine Discord server: https://discord.gg/EdJarnE

SylvainT
Site Admin
Posts: 494
Contact:

Unread post by SylvainT » 09 Dec 2017, 21:14

Hello x.iso,

One good suggestion is to have a solo safe option on rack, then your master rack you create don't need to be in solo to listen the rack you put in solo.

Having a master rack natively in Hollyhock is not convenient at all since Hollyhock is not just a stereo DAW. The master rack is not relevant in so many situtations...

All the best

Sylvain

User avatar
x.iso
Member
Posts: 565
Location: RU, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Unread post by x.iso » 09 Dec 2017, 23:25

Perhaps that would work as well. But I think there's no problem if it's just an option (to have master rack) and also you can have master rack output to multiple channels, so it's a matter of configuring master rack default settings.
join Hollyhock Usine Discord server: https://discord.gg/EdJarnE

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests