I think it would be extremely useful to modify most of the modules to have inverse operations.
Such as having a PassFlow Module with Pass and Pass_n, or a HasChanged with Out and Out_n
This could help keep patch designs clean, and more efficient.
I know this is quite some work, but believe it would be a huge enhancement that would have some great value.
-s
Inverse IO on Modules
do you mean a pass/stop module ?
that is a good idea !
that is a good idea !
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Yes Oli, but more Global for all modules.
Modules such as the ones I listed were just examples of how they could be implemented.
So many times doing logic I have to play a not, or I am running the opposite for a function. Seems having either option would be great.
So maybe if there is a worry of contention, even one single node could be used but in the settings for the module have the option to inverse.
However, I like the visual and additional node idea just as much.
-s
Modules such as the ones I listed were just examples of how they could be implemented.
So many times doing logic I have to play a not, or I am running the opposite for a function. Seems having either option would be great.
So maybe if there is a worry of contention, even one single node could be used but in the settings for the module have the option to inverse.
However, I like the visual and additional node idea just as much.
-s
"Every act of creation is first an act of destruction." -Picasso
for logic output adding a /out make the patching neater for sure
for say a fader, if it is 0 to 1 an output 1 to 0 is made with a (1 - x) fonction
in fact it should be max - x to cater to most of the cases.
BUT if each module is doing such opération it will end in more computation power needed, even if this output is not used.
isn't it the point of patching to use only what we need ?
I wouldn't like Usine becoming the new Live !
for say a fader, if it is 0 to 1 an output 1 to 0 is made with a (1 - x) fonction
in fact it should be max - x to cater to most of the cases.
BUT if each module is doing such opération it will end in more computation power needed, even if this output is not used.
isn't it the point of patching to use only what we need ?
I wouldn't like Usine becoming the new Live !
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
